inspecting a many_to_many datamapper relationship object

June 25th, 2009 •
tags: datamapper, ruby

The output of calling inspect on a datamapper many_to_many relationship object is very informative

migrating to datamapper 0.10.0

June 3rd, 2009 • 17 comments
tags: datamapper, ruby

Some prerequisites to get ready for datamapper 0.10.0

You need to have at least rubygems 1.3.5
You need to have a reasonably fresh rspec

The following git instructions only apply if you want to keep track of the ongoing datamapper development.
You can safely omit them if you followed the instructions in the original post to the google group.

sudo gem install addressable
mkdir git-sources
cd git-sources/
git clone git://github.com/datamapper/extlib.git
git clone git://github.com/datamapper/do.git
git clone git://github.com/datamapper/dm-core.git
git clone git://github.com/datamapper/dm-more.git
git clone git://github.com/snusnu/merb.git
cd extlib/
rake install
cd ..
cd do/data_objects/
rake install
cd ../do_sqlite3/
rake install
cd ../do_xxx/
rake install
cd ../..
cd dm-core/
rake install
cd ..
cd dm-more/
rake install
cd ..

Migrating your app to datamapper 0.10.0 is pretty painless,
you mainly need to deal with deprecation notices:

options[:class_name] is now options[:model]
PropertySet#has_property? is now PropertySet#named?
update_attributes is now update and doesn’t support the *allow_attributes parameter anymore
new_record? is now new?
:mutable => true on a has(n, :things, :through => :others) relationship is not supported/necessary anymore
:remote_name option for has(n, :things, :through => :others) is now called :via
:some_property.in => ['val1', 'val2'] is not supported anymore in queries, just use :some_property => ['val1', 'val2']
belongs_to :parent now defaults to :nullable => false
When adding to associations, post.comments.build(...) is now post.comments.new(...)

If you’re using merb and you’re fine using the master branch (upcoming merb-1.1) and not the latest release, all you need to do is update your wycats/merb clone or run the following commands.

cd git-sources/
git clone git://github.com/wycats/merb.git
cd merb
sudo rake install

If you however want to use datamapper 0.10.0 with latest merb release (1.0.12 at the time of writing) you will currently need to run these commands (Thx again teamon for taking the time to backport stuff!).
merb-1.0.13 will be released soon and will be fully compatible with datamapper 0.10.0.

cd git-sources/
git clone git://github.com/wycats/merb.git
cd merb
git checkout -b 1.0.x --track origin/1.0.x
sudo rake install

You will maybe get some warnings about merb-more but you can safely ignore them.

rake task to generate CHANGELOG file (for git repositories)

May 11th, 2009 •
tags: rake, ruby

generate (or update) a CHANGELOG file for git repositories (shamelessly copied from manveru/ramaze).

desc 'update changelog'
task :changelog do
  File.open('CHANGELOG', 'w+') do |changelog|
    `git log -z --abbrev-commit`.split("\0").each do |commit|
      next if commit =~ /^Merge: \d*/
      ref, author, time, _, title, _, message = commit.split("\n", 7)
      ref = ref[/commit ([0-9a-f]+)/, 1]
      author = author[/Author: (.*)/, 1].strip
      time = Time.parse(time[/Date: (.*)/, 1]).utc
      title.strip!

      changelog.puts "[#{ref} | #{time}] #{author}"
      changelog.puts '', " * #{title}"
      changelog.puts '', message.rstrip if message
      changelog.puts
    end
  end
end

strip whitespace using rake

May 9th, 2009 •
tags: rake, ruby

This snippet is taken from the wonderful webrat library

desc 'Removes trailing whitespace'
task :whitespace do
  sh %{find . -name '*.rb' -exec sed -i '' 's/ *$//g' {} \\;}
end

datamapper storage engine reflection

May 7th, 2009 •
tags: datamapper, ruby

# Find out what storage engines are installed and are supported by datamapper
# This could be especially useful in testing scenarios, where one wants to run
# specs against all adapters that are available on the machine in use.

require "rubygems"
require "dm-core"
require "spec"

module DataMapper

  def self.available_storage_engines
    [ :sqlite3, :mysql, :postgres ].select do |name|
      storage_engine_available?(name)
    end
  end

  def self.storage_engine_available?(name)
    ::DataObjects.const_defined?(Extlib::Inflection.classify(name.to_s))
  end

end

# spec helper
# set it so that it fits your actually installed do_xxx drivers
AVAILABLE_STORAGE_ENGINES = [
  :sqlite3,
  :mysql
  # :postgres
]

describe 'DataMapper storage engine reflection: ' do

  describe 'DataMapper.storage_engine_available?(name)' do
    it 'should return true for adapters known to be installed on this machine' do
      DataMapper.storage_engine_available?(:sqlite3).should  == AVAILABLE_STORAGE_ENGINES.include?(:sqlite3)
      DataMapper.storage_engine_available?(:mysql).should    == AVAILABLE_STORAGE_ENGINES.include?(:mysql)
      DataMapper.storage_engine_available?(:postgres).should == AVAILABLE_STORAGE_ENGINES.include?(:postgres)
    end
  end

  describe 'DataMapper.available_storage_engines' do
    it 'should try all adapters shipped with dm-core and return all adapters known to be installed on this machine' do
      storage_engines = DataMapper.available_storage_engines
      storage_engines.size.should == AVAILABLE_STORAGE_ENGINES.size
      storage_engines.each do |storage_engine|
        AVAILABLE_STORAGE_ENGINES.should include(storage_engine)
      end
    end
  end

end

# mungo:Desktop snusnu$ spec -cfs storage_engine_reflection.rb
#
# DataMapper storage engine reflection:  DataMapper.storage_engine_available?(name)
# - should return true for adapters known to be installed on this machine
#
# DataMapper storage engine reflection:  DataMapper.available_storage_engines
# - should try all adapters shipped with dm-core and return all adapters known to be installed on this machine
#
# Finished in 0.002688 seconds
#
# 2 examples, 0 failures

#validatable? should work on a belongs_to association

April 30th, 2009 •
tags: datamapper, ruby

The following ONLY APPLIES to datamapper-0.9.x, datamapper-0.10.0 doesn’t have this problem anymore

require "rubygems"
require "dm-core"
require "dm-validations"
require "spec"

DataMapper.setup(:default, "sqlite3::memory:")

class Person
  include DataMapper::Resource
  property :id, Serial
  has 1, :profile
  has n, :project_memberships
  has n, :projects, :through => :project_memberships
end

class Profile
  include DataMapper::Resource
  property :id, Serial
  property :person_id, Integer, :nullable => false
  belongs_to :person
end

class Project
  include DataMapper::Resource
  property :id, Serial
  has n, :tasks
end

class ProjectMembership
  include DataMapper::Resource
  property :id, Serial
  property :person_id, Integer, :nullable => false
  property :project_id, Integer, :nullable => false
  belongs_to :person
  belongs_to :project
end

class Task
  include DataMapper::Resource
  property :id, Serial
  property :project_id, Integer, :nullable => false
  belongs_to :project
end

describe "Resource#validatable?" do

  before(:all) do
    DataMapper.auto_migrate!
  end

  describe "when called directly on a Resource" do
    it "should return true if dm-validations are present" do
      Person.create.should be_validatable
      Profile.create.should be_validatable
      Project.create.should be_validatable
      ProjectMembership.create.should be_validatable
    end
  end

  describe "when called on an DataMapper::Associations::ManyToOne::Proxy" do

    it "should return true if dm-validations are present" do
      person  = Person.create
      project = Project.create
      membership = ProjectMembership.create :person => person, :project => project
      membership.person.should be_validatable
      membership.project.should be_validatable
    end

  end

  describe "when called on an DataMapper::Associations::OneToMany::Proxy" do

    describe "that points to a Resource related with has(n)" do

      it "should return true if dm-validations are present" do
        p = Project.create
        t = Task.create :project_id => p.id
        p.reload
        p.tasks.all? { |task| task.validatable? }.should be_true
      end

    end

    describe "that points to a Resource related with has(n, :through)" do

      it "should return true if dm-validations are present" do
        person  = Person.create
        project = Project.create
        membership = ProjectMembership.create :person => person, :project => project
        person.reload
        person.projects.all? { |p| p.validatable? }.should be_true
      end

    end

  end

end

# mungo:Desktop snusnu$ spec -c -f -s validatable.rb
#
# Resource#validatable? when called directly on a Resource
# - should return true if dm-validations are present
#
# Resource#validatable? when called on an DataMapper::Associations::ManyToOne::Proxy
# - should return true if dm-validations are present (FAILED - 1)
#
# Resource#validatable? when called on an DataMapper::Associations::OneToMany::Proxy that points to a Resource related with has(n)
# - should return true if dm-validations are present
#
# Resource#validatable? when called on an DataMapper::Associations::OneToMany::Proxy that points to a Resource related with has(n, :through)
# - should return true if dm-validations are present
#
# 1)
# 'Resource#validatable? when called on an DataMapper::Associations::ManyToOne::Proxy should return true if dm-validations are present' FAILED
# expected validatable? to return true, got false
# ./validatable.rb:67:
#
# Finished in 0.028411 seconds
#
# 4 examples, 1 failure

extlib/hook breaks if hooked method is redefined

April 29th, 2009 •
tags: datamapper, extlib, ruby

require "rubygems"
require "dm-core"
require "spec"

DataMapper.setup(:default, "sqlite3::memory:")

class Person

  include DataMapper::Resource

  property :id, Serial

  before :save, :shower
  after  :save, :shave

  def shower
    @showered = true
  end

  def shave
    @shaved = true
  end

  def showered?
    @showered
  end

  def shaved?
    @shaved
  end

end

describe "Hooking Resource#save" do

  before(:all) do
    DataMapper.auto_migrate!
  end

  describe "when the hooked method DOES CALL super" do

    before(:each) do
      class Person
        def save(context = nil)
          super(context)
        end
      end
    end

    it_should_behave_like "hooks"

  end

  describe "when the hooked method DOES NOT CALL super" do

    before(:each) do
      class Person
        def save(context = nil)
          true
        end
      end
    end

    it_should_behave_like "hooks"

  end

  describe "hooks", :shared => true do

    it "should preserve established before and after hooks" do
      p = Person.new
      p.should_not be_showered
      p.should_not be_shaved
      p.save
      p.should be_showered
      p.should be_shaved
    end

  end

end

# mungo:Desktop snusnu$ spec -c -f -s freak.rb
#
# Hooking Resource#save when the hooked method DOES CALL super
# - should preserve established before hooks
#
# Hooking Resource#save when the hooked method DOES NOT CALL super
# - should preserve established before hooks (FAILED - 1)
#
# 1)
# 'Hooking Resource#save when the hooked method DOES NOT CALL super should preserve established before hooks' FAILED
# expected showered? to return true, got nil
# ./freak.rb:76:
#
# Finished in 0.007412 seconds
#
# 2 examples, 1 failure

datamapper and inflection of the english word address

April 20th, 2009 •
tags: datamapper, ruby

require 'rubygems'

gem 'dm-core', '=0.9.12'
gem 'rspec'

require 'dm-core'
require "spec"

#DataMapper::Logger.new(STDOUT, :debug)
DataMapper.setup(:default, 'sqlite3:memory:')

Extlib::Inflection.rule 'ess', 'esses'
Extlib::Inflection.singular_word("address", "address")

class Person
  include DataMapper::Resource
  property :id, Serial
  has n, :addresses, :through => Resource
end

class Address
  include DataMapper::Resource
  property :id, Serial
end

describe "Inflection of 'Address'" do

  it "should work in DataMapper.auto_migrate!" do
    lambda { DataMapper.auto_migrate! }.should_not raise_error
  end

end

# mungo:Desktop snusnu$ spec -c -f -s address.rb
#
# Inflection of 'Address'
# - should work in DataMapper.auto_migrate!
#
# Finished in 0.040151 seconds
#
# 1 example, 0 failures

textmate rspec bundle (datamapper) helpers

April 9th, 2009 • 1 comment
tags: datamapper, rspec, ruby

I found that I often want to add debug outputs to the specs while working on them. Since I use textmate’s rspec bundle to run (focused) unit tests, I needed my debug messages to be html. Here’s what I came up with

http://gist.github.com/92470

dm-accepts_nested_attributes

April 8th, 2009 •
tags: datamapper, ruby

I just pushed http://github.com/snusnu/dm-accepts_nested_attributes/tree/master

It’s probably not quite complete yet, but it’s already reasonably specced and functional.

254 examples, 0 failures
89.7%   3 file(s)   473 Lines   234 LOC

Current status:

• belongs_to: create / destroy / update

• has(1): create / update/ destroy

• has(n): create / update / destroy

• has(n, :through): create / update / destroy

Also, since I need this rather soon for my current (merb) project, I wrote it for 0.9.11 I definitely want it to be available for next branch (of course) but I cannot spend any time on it now, since from what I read, the datamapper next branch is not production ready yet.

Anyways, I think it’d be really cool to have this in datamapper! (a plugin is perfeclty fine, needn’t be core). The API is almost the same (one minor change for now - have a look at the README) like the one activerecord has, which should mean, that once rails3 comes out, multimodel forms are totally possible with datamapper as ORM.

As for merb, I don’t really know if it has support for nested model assignment in its form_for and fields_for helpers. I have to say though, that I don’t really care, since I don’t use these helpers, but write the html that my designer colleague wants to see.

Any help, ideas, discussions on irc/email, forks, patches, whatever … really appreciated!

UPDATE 12

This commit added initial support for transactions. Currently, every call to save gets wrapped inside a transaction. However,there is still some work to do to make this solid. It’s also totally not specced atm.

UPDATE 11

This commit added a hook to allow to sanitize nested model attributes that get passed to a resource. See this thread on the rails-core list for the motivation behind this new method. Currently the method doesn’t do anything, but can be overwritten to perform just the amount of sanitization that you would like to apply.

UPDATE 10

With this patch from Rupert Voelcker, it is now possible to access the nested attributes also after Resource#save was called. This means that if for example a controller’s create action needs to redirect to the new action because the resource couldn’t be saved, the values the user previously entered can be displayed on the new form, just as you would expect. Thx again Rupert!

UPDATE 9

This commit added (experimental) support for dm-validations. More details explaining the current status and TODO list can be found in my post to the datamapper mailinglist

UPDATE 8

Rupert Voelcker sent a patch that allows renamed has(n, :through, :class_name, :child_key, :parent_key) associations to work with dm-accepts_nested_attributes. Thx a lot!

UPDATE 7

This commit added a new helper method for many_to_one (belongs_to) and one_to_one (has 1) associations, that will return either the associated record (if present) or a new record of the associated class. This is somehow close to activerecords build_association, I guess, but it differs in that it won’t build a new record in case that one is already associated. For this reason, I named it get_#{association}. It isn’t available for _to_many associations, since datamapper already provides get and build methods on their association proxy.

After I added this method, I read through Ryan’s Scraps again, and got reminded of his cool trick to achieve the same thing I’m trying to do with view helpers (I mainly added this feature to support fields_for a nested attribute). I totally agree when he says that it’s actually a view concern to prepare the resource for form submission, and I’m now thinking that I will maybe remove this added feauture from dm-accepts_nested_attributes

UPDATE 6

This commit added the possibility to specify a reject_if proc that gets passed all attributes. If the proc returns true, the creation of a new associated entry will be rejected. Now, dm-accepts_nested_attributes supports the same features as activerecord nested attribute assignment (I think).

UPDATE 5

This commit added the possibility to update has(n, :through) associations via #{association_name}_attributes=

This means that all (current) specs pass and everything works so far :) Hooray!

UPDATE 4

This commit added the possibility to destroy has(n, :through) associations via #{association_name}_attributes=

 UPDATE 3

This commit added the possibility to create has(n, :through) associations via #{association_name}_attributes=

UPDATE 2

It seems to me that this commit fixes the issue mentioned in UPDATE 1 since the new code should behave the same as dm-core-0.9.11 does if the association to be saved does not accept_nested_attributes

UPDATE 1

In order to get update working for belongs_to, has(1) and has(n), I commented out a line of dm-core-0.9.11 code which doesn’t seem to have too many effects. I ran the specs for 0.9.11 with this change incorporated, and mostly mocks(!) that expect the method call that i commented, fail. However, there is also one stack level too deep error Now, I don’t really know if this means that something else is broken really badly now, or if this can be worked around. The new failing dm-core specs after this commit are:

1)
SystemStackError in ‘DataMapper::Associations one to many associations #<< should add the correct number of elements if they are created’
stack level too deep
/Users/snusnu/projects/github/dm-core/lib/dm-core/repository.rb:41:in `scope’
/Users/snusnu/projects/github/dm-core/lib/dm-core.rb:181:in `repository’
/Users/snusnu/projects/github/dm-core/lib/dm-core/support/kernel.rb:6:in `repository’
/Users/snusnu/projects/github/dm-core/lib/dm-core/associations/relationship.rb:172:in `with_repository’
/Users/snusnu/projects/github/dm-core/lib/dm-core/associations/one_to_many.rb:298:in `save_resource’
/Users/snusnu/projects/github/dm-core/lib/dm-core/associations/one_to_many.rb:210:in `save’
/Users/snusnu/projects/github/dm-core/lib/dm-core/associations/one_to_many.rb:309:in `send’
/Users/snusnu/projects/github/dm-core/lib/dm-core/associations/one_to_many.rb:309:in `method_missing’
/Users/snusnu/projects/github/dm-core/lib/dm-core/associations/one_to_many.rb:210:in `save’
/Users/snusnu/projects/github/dm-core/lib/dm-core/resource.rb:301:in `hookable__save_nan_before_advised’
/Users/snusnu/projects/github/dm-core/lib/dm-core/resource.rb:301:in `each’
/Users/snusnu/projects/github/dm-core/lib/dm-core/resource.rb:301:in `hookable__save_nan_before_advised’
/Users/snusnu/projects/github/dm-core/lib/dm-core/associations/many_to_one.rb:64:in `save’
/Users/snusnu/projects/github/dm-core/lib/dm-core/associations/relationship.rb:172:in `with_repository’
/Users/snusnu/projects/github/dm-core/lib/dm-core/support/kernel.rb:6:in `repository’
/Users/snusnu/projects/github/dm-core/lib/dm-core.rb:181:in `repository’
/Users/snusnu/projects/github/dm-core/lib/dm-core/repository.rb:44:in `scope’

……………………

2)
Spec::Mocks::MockExpectationError in ‘DataMapper::Associations::ManyToOne::Proxy#save when the parent is not a new record should not save the parent’
#<ManyToOneSpec::Parent:0×1159388> expected :save with (no args) 0 times, but received it once
/Users/snusnu/projects/github/dm-core/lib/dm-core/associations/many_to_one.rb:64:in `save’
/Users/snusnu/projects/github/dm-core/lib/dm-core/associations/relationship.rb:172:in `with_repository’
/Users/snusnu/projects/github/dm-core/lib/dm-core/support/kernel.rb:6:in `repository’
/Users/snusnu/projects/github/dm-core/lib/dm-core.rb:181:in `repository’
/Users/snusnu/projects/github/dm-core/lib/dm-core/repository.rb:44:in `scope’
/Users/snusnu/projects/github/dm-core/lib/dm-core.rb:181:in `repository’
/Users/snusnu/projects/github/dm-core/lib/dm-core/support/kernel.rb:6:in `repository’
/Users/snusnu/projects/github/dm-core/lib/dm-core/associations/relationship.rb:172:in `with_repository’
/Users/snusnu/projects/github/dm-core/lib/dm-core/associations/many_to_one.rb:63:in `save’
/Users/snusnu/projects/github/dm-core/spec/integration/associations/many_to_one_spec.rb:116:

11)
Spec::Mocks::MockExpectationError in ‘DataMapper::Associations::ManyToOne::Proxy#save when the parent is not a new record should not save the parent’
Mock ‘relationship’ received unexpected message :with_repository with (#<Spec::Mocks::Mock:0×217d426 @name=”parent”>)
/Users/snusnu/projects/github/dm-core/lib/dm-core/associations/many_to_one.rb:63:in `save’
/Users/snusnu/projects/github/dm-core/spec/unit/associations/many_to_one_spec.rb:91:

12)
Spec::Mocks::MockExpectationError in ‘DataMapper::Associations::ManyToOne::Proxy#save when the parent is not a new record should return true’
Mock ‘relationship’ received unexpected message :with_repository with (#<Spec::Mocks::Mock:0×216d9cc @name=”parent”>)
/Users/snusnu/projects/github/dm-core/lib/dm-core/associations/many_to_one.rb:63:in `save’
/Users/snusnu/projects/github/dm-core/spec/unit/associations/many_to_one_spec.rb:95:

13)
Spec::Mocks::MockExpectationError in ‘DataMapper::Associations::ManyToOne::Proxy#save when the parent is a new record should save the parent’
Mock ‘parent’ expected :new_record? with (no args) once, but received it 0 times
/Users/snusnu/projects/github/dm-core/spec/unit/associations/many_to_one_spec.rb:101:

14)
Spec::Mocks::MockExpectationError in ‘DataMapper::Associations::ManyToOne::Proxy#save when the parent is a new record should return the result of the save’
Mock ‘parent’ expected :new_record? with (no args) once, but received it 0 times
/Users/snusnu/projects/github/dm-core/spec/unit/associations/many_to_one_spec.rb:101: